Member Login Contact (800) 490-4495

Mccain and Obama Vote for Bailout


What Made McCain And Obama Vote For Bailout, Despite Public Outcry Against The Bill? Pressure from the Elite.


Many people believe that the McCain and Obama vote for bailout was made despite the heavy public outcry against it because they are deeply within the pockets of powerful corporations and industrial tycoons.

According to many mainstream media websites, public sentiments over the bailout proposals during the early moments in the fiasco, around ninety percent of the public was opposed to giving money to banks through government sanctioned loans or so called bailouts.

As a result of this financial fiasco, the so called economic meltdown of 2008-2009 has become one of the most common topics across the globe in public places in virtually all nations.

Many of these conversations tend to focus on criticism of the system or those operating it, and this is also reflected in various polls taken in the last several years that show citizens are highly critical of the entire process and few believe it will turn out as success.

Most citizens believe that the proposed bailouts were going against the traditions of capitalism and self reliance that made the modern economy so vibrant today, however there have been strong arguments that the economy that the bailouts happened in is far from a capitalist system.

The fact of the matter is that the government has already been deeply invested in private enterprises for quite a long time, and is evident by the fact that AIG is a government run operation prior to its need for a bailout in the first place.

Both major candidates went along with the bailout scheme, and so they have been accused of being in cahoots with the money powers that created the financial meltdown in the first place and so there is no way it can be solved without being robbed in the process.



What’s the Difference?

Many people have complained that because both McCain and Obama vote for bailout programs, that they are basically no different from each other than anyone else.

They may claim Republican or Democrat, but they both essentially agree on allowing financial powers to dictate the direction of our national policies.

The fact that both parties have voted in favor of the bailout packages signifies that they are actually one party with two components, rather than two opposing parties as had been believed previously.

Many view this as the power of financial institutions showing that it has no bounds and can control any candidate from any party, and win their votes.


Third Parties

As many voters are becoming increasingly displeased with the actions of Democrats and Republicans alike, they have become active in third parties as a result.

These other political parties give citizens the opportunity to oppose bailouts directly, and to join together with others who share the same concerns and form a political movement.

Because typical politicians such as McCain and Obama vote for bailout packages even when the public is screaming for them to vote against it, third party candidates have been growing in popularity and have gained an impressive following.

Such notable parties opposing these outrageous sized bailout packages are Libertarians, Constitutionalists, Green Party, and Independents among many others.

These groups have gained appeal as the major parties collapse under the weight of their corruption.


Trillions in Bailouts

Since Congress and Obama vote for bailout after bailout, and continue building up the national debt while claiming they will fix the debt soon, many citizens have became curious exactly how much more of this will continue.

So far, trillions of dollars have been thrown into bailout packages for massive corporations in order to prop them up beyond their means, and the needs for more bailouts continues to skyrocket.

As more and more bailout packages are granted, people believe that something within the economic situation will have to break.

No matter how humans may manipulate it, the economy is a balanced system and when imbalances are placed within it, all other parts of the system rearrange to conform to the new imbalances.

Because of these imbalances, many believe that the trillion dollar bailouts will simply debase our national currency until it becomes essentially worthless and we will require the use of a new more efficient currency system, such as a one world currency.





Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>