---

Are Globalization Tactics Used by Big Businesses Fair? When Implementing Their Globalization Strategies, Are These Companies Doing the Right Thing for Everyone?

---

DTSS.us reviews that globalization tactics ethical for everyone involved or just for the banking elite who control the corporations who stand to profit?

Proponents of globalization say it is win-win for both big business and the developing country.

Big business gets to make their products cheaper and profit margins larger.

Developing countries get technology and infrastructure improvements that would have otherwise not happened anytime soon; not to mention jobs for their unemployed and revenue streams for their governments.

If it were this simple than what fun would all the economists and politicians have when they meet at their conferences and other informative meetings?

The fact is, the effects of globalization are felt by many people, home and abroad, and not just in the pocket book alone.

It is the right of big business to operate in a manner by which they are able to optimize their profit margins.

Countries can just as easily say no to big business and not let them build their factories and production centers within their borders.

But is it right to underpay and overwork ignorant people who are forced to take the work or not feed their families at all?

Is it right for the banking elite to abide by the rule of the law, the law which they make, and then hurt people with their results?

Their goal for a New World Order is so strongly set in their minds that they will stop at nothing, including killing people, to achieve it.

Just what these effects are and the extent to which they are felt can be determined, or at least better defined, by discussing globalization tactics. Are globalization tactics legal?

Some of the things corporations are able to get away with in other countries they would not be legally allowed to do in the United States. Are globalization tactics moral?

It may be hard to believe, but there are more important things in life then making money–even in corporate America.

Are globalization tactics right? Sometimes being allowed to do something does not mean one should still do it; the fallout and residual effects may be more then bargained for.

The plan of the elite is to make the laws that suit them and run over anybody in their way. Is this something we should morally allow?

---

---

Are Globalization Tactics Legal?

The army of lawyers that corporations employ are quick to answer yes to the question of the legality of globalization tactics.

With exceptions that undoubtedly exist (it would be unrealistic to think every single transaction is completely legitimate) the tactics used in globalization are generally legal.

The key factor is in following the requirements and procedures created by the host country. Iran is currently experiencing a tremendous amount of growth and a prime example of globalization in action.

Over one thousand countries are currently awaiting government approval to begin work within Iran’s borders, some 240 are already approved.

Iran requires foreign investors to apply for approval through the government each time they bid on a project.

This ensures only serious investors are considered for approval and also allows Iranian companies to remain active and prosperous in their own country.

It would be a shame if foreign investment were allowed in but at the expense of local business (sound familiar America?).

---

Morality and Money

A sound economic method by which a company can improve its profit margins is by discovering ways in which to lower operating expenses.

In the United States this can be somewhat difficult due to the mountain of legislation placing requirements on companies regarding the environment, labor rights, and work conditions, among other things.

Probably one of the more demanding expenses incurred by corporations involves methods/processes/tools it is forced to use in order to reduce the level of pollution it produces.

While the accountants and owners may not be happy with this expenditure, it is the law. More importantly, one should feel a moral obligation to take care of the world we live in.

But what about the ability to make a living? All these regulations and requirements make it hard for businesses to turn a profit without charging a small fortune for their products.

With the onset of globalization, companies are now able to seek out countries with looser or non-existent pollution laws, saving millions in production costs.

Globalization tactics of this type are legal? Sadly–yes. Are they moral? Many would say that business does not exist for moral purposes; it exists for the sake of making money.

This is exactly the philosophy of the banking elite. They exist to make money and gain more power, they have no interest in helping people live fulfilling lives.

Are globalization tactics like this right? Different people have different values; it depends on what these values are in order to weigh the pros and cons and determine the answer to that question.

Most honest, hard working people would say no, it is wrong to hurt people in the process of making money. The global banking elite, however, would beg to differ. They will stop at nothing to get their New World Order.

---

---