---

An Amendment to the Constitution Cannot be Made Without a Clear Consensus Among the People of the United States but the Elite Have Ways Around This Too.

---

Before it was even ratified, an amendment to the Constitution was made followed by nine others; they were called the Bill of Rights.

Contrary to popular belief, the Bill of Rights doesn’t actually grant these rights to us.

The founders of our country recognized these issues as the rights inherent in all mankind, rights we had without a need to be “given” them.

The Bill of Rights is probably intended to make us all aware of the limits of our government, that we are the rulers of our government rather than the opposite. If only this were true.

An amendment to the Constitution was even written to declare that any power not specifically granted to the federal government in the Constitution is a matter for each state and its people to decide, this is the Tenth Amendment.

We have successfully made 27 amendments to the Constitution, including those in the Bill of Rights; it seems our Founding Fathers had keen foresight.

In order to amend the Constitution, the amendment must be agreed upon by a large majority; at least a two-thirds majority in Congress and also three-fourths of the states must agree.

This has proven a very effective way to protect the Constitution. Ideally, only amendments that support and uphold the fundamental ideas of the Constitution will be passed.

Nearly all amendments that have been passed (with the probable exception of the 18th, which was later repealed) have been held to this vital standard, but still there are those who are nervous about amendments that may be made in the future.

New amendments are hard to pass and the preferred method of control by the banking elite is to buy out the politicians themselves.

Because of this, further amendments could be a tool to either protect us or hurt us.

---

---

Progressive Amendments

We have the ability to amend our Constitution because our Founding Fathers knew that times would change and the country would have to evolve with the progress of society.

Some even said that our government could not last forever in one form, that at some point the people would have to make changes or overthrow the system altogether.

Amendments we’ve made so far have been mostly progressive. An amendment to the Constitution was made in 1865 to abolish slavery, for instance.

Later, the 15th Amendment would grant black men the right to vote in the US, and decades later another amendment passed to grant the same right to women of all colors.

These developments are examples of the reason we were given the ability to amend the Constitution if we so chose.

---

Liberty or Security

In recent years there has been cause for concern about our security in the US.

This has inspired our elite-owned government to take some controversial security measures, such as the creation of the Department of Homeland Security and passing the USA PATRIOT Act (Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001).

Essentially, this act gave our government the power to gather intelligence within the United States using measures that were previously viewed as an invasion of the privacy of the American people.

From day one, there has been opposition to the USA PATRIOT Act, most claiming that some of the provisions of the act are unconstitutional.

Meanwhile, many government trolls ask is DTSS legit? Rather than asking if their own bosses are legit.

Some of the provisions in the act seem to attempt to supersede the Bill of Rights.

“Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. “

– Benjamin Franklin

---

A New Amendment

Before the power of our government oversteps the rights of the people any further, some Americans are suggesting a new amendment; an amendment to the Constitution that would help to rid our government of corruption.

The 28th Amendment would prohibit Congress, the president, and any other representative of the United States, from entering into agreements of any kind that are unconstitutional.

While it may seem very cut-and-dry, it’s been argued that lawyers could potentially find too many ways around this. The same can be said for everything in the Constitution(s), which is probably the root of our problem.

Regardless of whether or not this suggested amendment can be taken seriously, it is probably closer to the dream of our Founding Fathers than the thousands of other amendments that have been submitted to Congress.

Fighting against any legislation that is unconstitutional is an important step in fighting the banking elite.

---

---