Analysis of JFK Assassination Reveals More Than One Gunman Involved.

Analysis of JFK assassination can be very revealing, and in every case, very convincing as evidence seems to ‘exist’ for every conspiracy theory that has been proposed.

However, the fact remains, that a series of gunshots that ended the life of one of America’s greatest Presidents has lead to what may be one of the most ruthless cover up operations in what definitely is the most significant cold case file of this century.

The Warren Commission is the first and official document in the analysis of the assassination of JFK, and it reads like a story.

Here you will find the ”lone assassin” theory, keeping in mind that this very Commission was developed at the hands of the government that took office after JFK died.

In other words, the man with the strongest motive, and a Presidency to gain with JFK’s assassination, decided who went on the Commission to ”investigate” the crime.

However, any person that HAS investigated this case that was not on the Warren Commission has said there are huge gaps in the story, gaps that are impossible to fill because the cover up is just that deep.

We know that three bullets were fired. One bullet missed, and two other bullets caused a total of eight wounds to both JFK and to the Governor of Texas John Connally.

According to Gallup polls, in 1964 52% of Americans thought a conspiracy was involved.

In 1993, 89% of Americans believed there was a cover up. Unofficially today, almost every American believes there was a cover up.

The police chief from Dallas who was a chief investigator at the time says the gaps in the shooting are so significant, that there is no forensic way that less than two gunmen were participants in the shooting.

Analysis of JFK Assassination: Today, Forensics Would Exclude Oswald as the Shooter

In fact, further analysis of JFK assassination reveals that absolutely no proof was found that Oswald even fired his gun.

Kennedy’s aide at the time, Kenneth O’Donnell, was riding in the motorcade behind JFK at the time of the shooting, and has since said that though he knows nothing of the shooting, the FBI (as directed by J. Edgar Hoover, one of JFK’s known enemies) had pressured him to not say what he felt.

Which was that the gunfire came from the front of the motorcade, and not from behind.

A key player in the analysis of JFK assassination was Prouty, who worked as the Chief of Special Operations for the Joint Chiefs of Staff in the Kennedy Administration.

He was high ranking, and knew about military operatives and how it could or could not be possible that eight wounds could come from ‘3’ gunshots.

At the age of 82, Prouty wrote several books on the topic, with strong proof toward CIA involvement.

In this proof he includes a series of six photographs that were taken within just a few minutes of the shooting.

Three people are seen behind the ‘grassy knoll’ in Dealey Plaza carrying guns.

These men remain a mystery, and they boldly walked past uniformed officers, yielding weapons just minutes after a President was shot, yet they were never questioned.

Is Prouty the Most Eloquent Bluffer of Our Time?

Most of Prouty’s evidence in the analysis of JFK assassination points to CIA involvement, in fact he outright abolishes the Mafia theory, and any theories pointing to a Castro involvement.

”From my official experience, I know that there are two parts to any assassination. One, the hit, and two, the cover-up. By far and away the cover story is the most difficult.

”It requires the most professionalism and creative ability. The cover story must continue for years, as the JFK scenario does.

”The Mafia, Castro, etc. could not have done part two and have maintained it for 33 years. I have worked on assassinations and I know the business. The master plan was fantastic.”

– Fletcher Prouty

Yet, even Prouty does not know who (specifically) killed JFK.

However, he has been designated as a qualified expert on who DIDN’T kill JFK. And for many Americans, that’s a start.