Do Barack Obama Socialist Tendencies Affect America. A Dangerous Trend Towards Excessive State Power Typically Emerges From Such Systems; Obama Serves Elite Interests.

Is Barack Obama socialist? Democrats and people around Obama and those who will vote for him “peeshaw” at that notion, as if it’s a silly notion dreamed up by Republicans to undermine his efforts to get elected.

The problem is, it’s true, Barack Obama’s policies are socialist in nature.

And with his presidency, and the general fear in this country of the “impending” economic collapse, more socialist policies will be put in place since FDR was president.

The very idea of the government bailing out financial institutions and banks is socialist.

Universal healthcare is a socialist idea, no matter how good we all think it would be for all people including children who need it to be able to get medical care.

The idea of the government investing in things like green energy, or investing in any business matters, is inherently socialist.

The idea that those who are not failing should now bail out those who are is socialist and communist.

Some people feel that the idea of communism is nothing more than an old joke that doesn’t apply anymore, but in a communist society everything is distributed equally.

Fascism, another word many people don’t really understand, means that the government controls everyone’s lives, from what they own to what they do and how they’re allowed to do it.

Socialism has everything controlled by a central government that handles production and distribution, so it’s only a slight step away from communism, and fascism.

With government bailouts and the expansion of government planned Barack Obama socialist policies the intent is to put more power in a growing government, for your own good.

Barack Obama Socialist: Close to Socialism?

If communism has the government in control and everyone getting everything equally, and fascism has the government in control and distributing what they want, and socialism is the government controlling goods and distributing them, how does the United States figure into those definitions?

Look at the recent AIG mess, where they got billions in government aid and then awarded their people, in an institution that was failing, huge bonuses.

An immediate outcry was heard, both from the public and the government over those bonuses, because the Barack Obama socialist sentiment said that they had wasted the taxpayer money they were given.

Death threats were made to some of the people who received them and punishment and retribution was urged, even to the tune of taxing the bonuses at a 90% rate.

They were urged to return the bonuses, and legislations was started to force at least half of the bonus money to be returned.

If AIG had been failing, and private investors had given them the bailout loan money, would the public and the government have risen up in anger at those bonuses?

Now, because of the bailout, the company is essentially controlled by the government and public opinion, which is socialist, and definitely not a part of a free market society.

Socialism to Fascism

And the socialist agenda is only one small part of the bigger plan. The New World Order, of which Obama is a pawn, will be a true fascist society and it’s virtually here.

Most everything we do is controlled by some law or other. Most everything we say can be overheard or the places we go to we’re monitored in one way or another, overtly or covertly.

We haven’t owned the money system for almost a century so we’re slaving away to pay off the debt to private individuals who are the only ones to benefit.

And these same elite have more plans. The economic mess and the puppet leader we have are only steps toward yet even more of the same.