---

Understand That Many a Federal Drug Law Includes Topics Like Removing Habeas Corpus, Building a Police State, and Creating a Cashless Society.

---

The following discusses the ramifications of a federal drug law called the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 (P.L. 100-690). 

As you’ll see, when the rogue U.S. Government passes laws today, the actual wording usually has nothing to do with what the title alludes to. 

Remember, this is only one of many, many draconian laws passed in America that are eroding everything our Constitution gave us.

“The Constitution of the United States, Article I, Section 9, paragraph 2 states:

” “The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of rebellion or invasion, the Public Safety may require it”.

“Public Law 100-690, Sec. 7323, provides for a Special Committee on Habeas Corpus Review of Capital Sentences, appointed by the Chief justice of the United States.

“The purpose of the Special Committee is to recommend to the Chief Justice of the United States, who will forward the recommendation to the chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate, a proposal of a bill to modify Federal habeas corpus procedure.”

---

---

Federal Drug Law: Quotes from P.L. 100-690

“This bill to modify habeas corpus procedure must be reported with or without recommendation by the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate by the end of the 60th day of session after the submission of the report or the bill must be automatically placed on the appropriate calendar of the Senate.

“Once the habeas corpus bill is on the calendar, it is not debatable; it is not subject to a motion to postpone; reconsideration of the vote by which the motion is agreed to or disagreed to shall not be in order under this act.

“Only one motion in the Senate shall be in order pursuant to this paragraph and such motion shall be decided by a roll call vote.

“SIT UP AND TAKE NOTICE! Section 7323 states that this habeas corpus legislation is enacted byCongress as an exercise of the rule-making power of the Senate and as such it is deemed a part of the rules of the Senate… CAN YOU BELIEVE THIS TREASON?”

---

Federal Drug Law: Setting Precedent for Police State

“Chapter 33 of Title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end thereof Sec. 540, which states that the Attorney General and theFederal Bureau of Investigation may investigate felonious killings of officials and employees of a State or political subdivision when such investigation is requested by the head of the agency employing the official or employee killed, and under such guidelines as the Attorney General or his designee may establish.

“Notice that the above paragraph does not say by invitation of theState, but says by the employing agency. Once the Feds are involved they always hold jurisdiction.

“THIS IS SERIOUS! It could establish the legal precedence for justification of a police state once the courts rule that theStates have given up their right to jurisdiction under this act.

“Notice that it only involves crimes of a POLITICAL nature.”

---

Federal Drug Law: Studying Cashless Society

“Businesses are required to report all cash transactions of $10,000 ormore (Sec. 7601 /60501-IRS). (It has been reported to me but not verified byme that this requirement has been lowered to $3000.)

“This has nothing to do with drugs but has everything to do with theirs.

“The act establishes a requirement to record and verify the I.D. of apurchaser of a money order or other financial instrument of $3000 or more(Sec. 6184/5325).

“WHY? This is a big one. The act orders a study to be made on whether towithdraw $100 bills and $50 bills from circulation (Sec. 6187).

“This would virtually propel us into a cashless society.$23 million dollars has been allocated for machine-readable identity document program.

“The excuseused is to be able to identify known criminals who attempt to crossborders.

“The type of border is not named (required in legislation) andcould be the border of your city, county or state.

“It also raises the question of how they are going to get the criminals to accept the identity document program without requiring all citizens to participate (Sec.6604.)”

The above excerpt comes from Behold a Pale Horse (1991), by William Cooper (pp. 154-155).

---

---