People Use a Biometric FAQ to Learn the Dangers of NWO Technology. Science Could be Used to Improve Life for All People; Instead it is Used to Enslave & Control Us.

With biometrics being a hot topic of discussion, a biometric FAQ, or list of frequently asked questions, can help us understand.

One question that is often asked is about the difference between verification and a dedication that is made using biometrics. The answer lies in the way biometric data is being matched.

To verify that individuals are who they say they are, biometric verification simply compares the data for the person concerned with one specific reference in a database.

To identify someone, on the other hand, requires not only capturing their biometric data but also then comparing this with all possible matches in a database.

Depending on how the databases have been organized and how matching processes have been defined, identification will then converge on a limited number of possible candidates-in theory, just one.

However, if the person’s data is not in the database, or if the biometric data captured is faulty, then identification may fail completely.

Examples of this have been seen in terms of iris recognition, when irises are scanned out of focus, at the wrong distance, or when a person’s eyes are half shut.

Not all the Answers are Available to the Public

Biometric systems may also be either privately or publicly organized. The consequences of individual “no longer existing” in a government database can be extremely serious.

Another question from many a biometric FAQ concerns the possibility of biometric data being stolen from databases. In theory, when data such as fingerprints are stored in a database, the complete image is not recorded.

Simply what is known as a template is stored in the database to be compared to a similar template constructed at the time when fingerprints are matched.

Some Things Better Left Unsaid?

However, between what is stated and what is done, there is a potential gray area, even in a biometric FAQ. Classical ways of fingerprinting using physical imprints and ink recorded all of the data.

There is nothing to stop governments for example using systems that do the electronic equivalent. The system used by police for automated fingerprint identification in a criminal context already does this.

If this also happens in a non-criminal context, then it becomes eminently possible to steal or at least misappropriate biometric data from a database.

Other Things Need to be Made Public Now

An increasing number of questions relating to a biometric FAQ are also being asked about VeriChip technology, which is being introduced in the United States.

This is the ultimate in biometric matching, and relies on the simple surgical implantation of a very small microchip. The microchip, which is just a little bigger than a grain of rice, carries a radio frequency identification code.

People who have the VeriChip implanted in them can be scanned just like items in a store. The chip gives a sixteen-digit number to the scanner that can then be fed into a database.

In the database, this number is then matched against a file containing data about the person concerned. When the VeriChip is used, there is in theory no further need for facial recognition, iris scanning, fingerprints or voice recognition.

The only limitation on the VeriChip chip solution today is that firstly it has to be implanted, and secondly it can only be scanned locally.

However, it is not beyond the bounds of imagination to conceive of a way of introducing similar devices that masquerade as simple inoculations and injections.

And with increasingly sensitive scanners and detectors, the RFID code may be available from yards, hundreds of yards or even miles away.