Fair Credit Reporting Act Background Checks Are Used as Yet Another Method to Track and Control the American Public in Their Enslavement to Debt.

Today, Fair Credit Reporting Act background checks have become mainstream practice and are frequently used by employers when hiring new employees.

There are a number of excuses for the increase in popularity of these background checks.

National security, child abductions, and lawsuits brought by potential customers of the employer, due to negligence on the part of the employee, are part of the proclaimed benefits of the act.

There are also certain jobs that require background checks as part of the licensing procedure.

The average person is going to assume that if they have nothing scandalous from their past to hide, then submitting to a background check is of very little consequence.

What they do not realize is that information can be unearthed that may be interpreted incorrectly, that may effect the judgment of others toward them, or that may be completely inaccurate.

As well and more importantly, the elite have access to our financial and background records as yet one more way to track and therefore control us.

Background checks can include a number of sources of information including driving records, drug tests, medical records, character witnesses, and consumer credit scoring.

These previously would have been protected with our right to privacy, but this right is being destroyed before our eyes.

Many people are confused by the difference between a standard background check that an employer may request and a background check that deals strictly with one’s finances.

Certain things are not allowed to be included in consumer credit checks including decade old bankruptcies, accounts placed in collections seven or more years prior, and civil lawsuit information.

However, all of these things may be included in a background check conducted by a potential employer.

The fair credit reporting act background checks are yet one more way for us to lose our privacy at the hands of the government and the elite bankers behind them.

Discriminatory Practices Accepted

What does this mean in this day and age of government snooping and dwindling privacy?

Laws are written to make certain forms of discrimination concerning a person’s financial status illegal, but there is very little that can be done as far as monitoring this.

Just like in most cases of discrimination, it would be difficult to prove that a bankruptcy a potential employer learned about was the reason someone was not hired for a job.

As well, how can we prove the elite are in there snooping? Just trust them, where there’s more control to be had, they’ll have it on the road to there New World Order.

There are limitless reasons an employer can give for their choice of employee, and they are free to hire whomever they choose.

However, the question remains, should a relative stranger that is conducting a job interview have access to information such as a bankruptcy that an interviewee filed years ago?

Take this Job…

In certain instances, individual state laws give employees rights that are in addition to the fair credit reporting act background checks.

Individuals are guaranteed the right to know when a background check has been requested on them.

If a decision concerning employment is going to be made based on the consumer credit report, the employer is obligated to tell the employee prior to the action being taken through a pre-adverse action disclosure.

The current laws concerning the fair credit reporting act background do not take certain factors into effect, such as an employer conducting their own background check without using a third party.

If this situation were to occur, the potential employee would not be entitled to the information that was a part of the decision made by the employer.

The other loophole is the fact that employers can choose not to answer questions honestly.

This also means a potential employee would not be entitled to the records used to make the decision.

In both of these instances, someone could fall victim to erroneous information included in their fair credit reporting act background file, and go a number of years never knowing why they were being turned down by employers.

While the safety of employers and customers is extremely important, a large bureaucracy is distributing information on individuals and the only person that has a stake in holding the disseminating parties accountable is that individual, who may or may not be fully informed.

This leaking of private information and distrust and chaos that enuses is exactly as planned by the elite.

By weakening our Constitution and the rights it promises they can more easily take over, which they are doing very well.