---

Actions Tell the Obama Position on Government Spending While His Campaign Platitudes Told Nothing but Lies. Obama is Plundering the U.S. Treasury for the NWO.

---

Every presidential candidate says what they think voters want to hear and the Obama position on government spending was no exception.

This is just the nature of the game of electoral politics.

This truth is unfortunate. Remember George H.W. Bush’s “Read My Lips: No New Taxes?”

Obama campaigned heavily on a number of points, not least of which was restoring transparency and honesty to the federal government including its spending.

Both of these would be welcome changes from the Bush years of cronyism and secrecy, but Obama’s campaign promises ended up being just words.

His campaign promises told us nothing about the true Obama position on government spending.

His actions and policies are the only way we will really know the truth of his position.

So far he is doing exactly as instructed, but by the banking elite and not by the American people who voted for him.

Sadly, our presidents are now purchased by the banking elite and have been for decades.

With the elite’s absolute control over our monetary system through their ownership of the Federal Reserve Banking System, and use of brainwashing techniques through the media, which they also own, they are able to convince the American people of just about anything.

Obama and his hollow campaign promises are just the latest in a long string of puppets.

---

---

What’s the Story?

It has been months now since Obama’s inauguration–what have we gotten so far?

Obama’s proposed budget features a sixteen percent rise in non-military discretionary spending a portion of the budget which makes up one sixth of total expenditures.

This is the largest rise in discretionary spending since the mid-1960s, which seems to say a lot about the Obama position on government spending.

While proposing massive budget increases sixteen percent is well beyond the combined rate of inflation and population growth Obama has criticized the doubling of government contract spending to $500 billion over the last eight years.

This is certainly a valid criticism of the previous administration but is only designed to momentarily appease the public.

Obama pointed out $295 billion in cost overruns in defense contracts, a massive expenditure by any measure, vowing to crack down on abuses by contractors.

Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack stated that all cabinet members had been instructed to scrutinize the way their departments spend money, and to make sure that all contracts are money well spent.

Fine words to define the Obama position on government spending, but while saying these things the president has been pushing an omnibus appropriations bill with 9,000 earmarks and $410 billion of spending.

So which is it then?

---

Meet the New Chief Performance Officer

As part of his purported push to streamline and improve government spending, Obama has created the new high level adviser position of “Chief Performance Officer” tasked with identifying and rooting out wasteful spending.

Nancy Killefer, a former treasury department official from Bill Clinton’s administration has been given the job, and cabinet members have been instructed to meet with her to review the spending done by their departments.

In a high profile press conference on March 4, 2009, Obama discussed the contracting system, signing a memorandum to reform the system by which contracts are awarded and how accountability and oversight are managed.

The question remains, however, in the midst of these mixed signals: what is the Obama position on government spending?

The best answer that can be drawn from his actions so far is that he is not opposed to spending at all.

Rather, he will gladly spend on anything that serves the elite agenda.

They chose Obama for a reason and his actions are proving they picked a very fine puppet. 

---

---