What Differences in Wiretapping Europe Compared to America?
In Wiretapping Europe Much of What is Illegal in the US Suddenly Becomes Legal.
The United States appears to be exporting the wiretapping Europe now wants.
Recent collaboration between the US wiretapping program and European authorities, and the thwarting of supposed terrorist operations in both Germany and Denmark have been vaunted by entities such as the National Counterterrorism Center.
The suggestion has also been made that this success should means that Congress should safeguard the US wiretapping program and prevent any attempts to restrict it.
This sounds like a classic politician’s argument of trying to justify a general effect with specific occurrences.
The general effect is the deprivation of civil liberties and the specific occurrences are the isolated incidents of detection of so-called terrorist activity.
Whether the terrorists were active in the matter or not is a secondary issue.
Terrorism is on principle a dangerous and undesirable phenomenon, but the indiscriminate extension of US wiretapping to multinational proportions is as well.
The actions have a disconcerting parallel in the influence of ‘policy advisory’ groups such as the Council for Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission in the United States, and the Bilderberg Group in Europe.
Wiretapping Their Way Across the Globe
Only a lack of information from any similar events in Japan prevents the proportions of wire-tapping from being described as ‘global’, but with the contribution of Japanese members to the Trilateral Commission, this may not be far off.
These advisory bodies have close links to a number of the large banking concerns in the world, organizations that entertain the possibility of a world government put in place, that they could then ‘advise’.
Leading figures of bodies including the Council for Foreign Relations such as David Rockefeller have already stated their goal to put all current nations under one umbrella organization, which could include wiretapping Europe.
Legalizing Watergate Tactics in Europe
The ”united wiretapping front” in wiretapping Europe that has now been observed is a sign of the way that links are being strengthened across the board so that individual national sovereignty, such as that of the United States, will be weakened.
In countries such as Germany for example, courts have already rejected challenges to the country’s phone-tapping surveillance law, using the justification that wiretapping was crucial for detecting terrorist infiltration.
In Ireland, similar measures are afoot with legislation to authorize police breaking in to private property to install hidden microphones and video cameras.
The Irish Government’s Covert Surveillance Bill is supposed to legitimize what has already been going on.
Courts are supposed to authorize any surveillance like this except in cases of exceptional urgency, which may be too loosely defined to prevent possible abuse.
Swedish Government- Democrats or Secret Dictators?
In Serbia, the government telecommunications agency even tells telecoms operators how it wants them to make spying easier for it.
Internet service providers are to be obliged to let police access their databases, including data on electronic mail or sites that customers have visited.
In the country that till this point inspired many people around the world with its socialist ideals and attitude on human rights, Sweden now has a law obliging all telcos and ISPs to copy the Swedish Intelligence Service on all cross-border communications.
It looks like the world government action group has been extraordinarily effective in getting so many national governments to set about wiretapping Europe the same way. Free yourself from their theft of your freedom. Become a DTSS sovereign today.